Public interest litigation (PIL) refers to a legal proceeding where an individual or group of people files a case concerning the general public. It aims to bring about social justice by raising issues that may not be covered under any other law. Public Interest Litigation is a way for members of the general public to take action if they see something wrong being done. In these proceedings, the court can be approached directly with a case instead of through lawyers or agents. This article provides you with all you need to know about Public Interest Litigation as it is defined in India and as it exists around the world.
What is the history of public interest litigation?
Table of Contents
Public interest litigation (PIL) was first introduced in India in the 1970s. Before this, only people who had direct and obvious stakes in a case could file a case in court. This meant that the state had the exclusive right to bring about justice in cases that don’t involve an obvious plaintiff. The Supreme Court first used the term in a case called Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India in 1978. The Court described PIL as a “misuse of the process of the court”, and “as a potent instrument for social change”. While the Court acknowledged that PIL can be a useful resource for social change, it also warned that it could be “misused by any person for any purpose.” Over the last 40 years, the Indian legal system has made efforts to refine and clarify the process of PIL. In 1993, the Supreme Court issued a set of guidelines to define what PIL is and how it works in India. These guidelines came after a large number of cases were filed in court with no real petitioner and no real grievance, so that the Court had no one whom it could serve notice.
Why is Public Interest Litigation important?
The legal system is designed to resolve disputes between two parties: an individual and another individual, an individual and the state, or two parties that are other companies or organizations. Managing social problems like pollution, education, or healthcare through the court system is inefficient because it isn’t designed to tackle these types of problems. Managing these problems through the court system is also often ineffective because judges have limited power to enforce their decisions.
What does Public Interest Litigation look like?
There are many different types of PIL cases. Here are a few examples of PIL cases that have been brought in India: – A group of activists brought a PIL against the Indian government for failing to issue warnings about hazardous levels of air pollution in Delhi and other cities. This PIL resulted in the government issuing warnings about pollution and raised awareness about air pollution in India. – An NGO brought a PIL against the Indian government for failing to create a transparent process for granting coal mining permits. This PIL resulted in the creation of a transparent process for granting coal mining permits. – A group of activists brought a PIL against the Indian government for failing to create a system that records sex offenders. This PIL resulted in the creation of a system that records sex offenders.
Limitations of Public Interest Litigation
PIL cases generally deal with challenging government policies or practices. The government is not always the right party to bring a social issue to court because its decision-making process is often more concerned with political objectives than with social objectives. This can result in a failure to create the social change that PIL cases aim to bring about. Furthermore, PIL cases often deal with issues that are already the subject of other legislation. Bringing the same issue to court under PIL instead of the legislation that already exists can lead to duplication of effort and waste of resources.
How is PIL defined in India?
According to the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court of India in 1993, a PIL must meet certain criteria in order to be accepted by the court. These criteria include: – The issue must be serious and of general public importance. – The issue must have arisen recently or be imminent. – There must be a connection between the issue and the person bringing the case. – There must be no other person who can bring the case. – There must be no alternative remedy available to bring the issue.
Conclusion
Public interest litigation is an important tool that allows members of the general public to take action if they see something wrong being done. In these proceedings, the court can be approached directly with a case instead of through lawyers or agents. It is also a way to challenge government policies or practices. The legal system is designed to resolve disputes between two parties: an individual and another individual, an individual and the state, or two companies or organizations. Managing social problems through the court system is inefficient and can result in a failure to create the social change that public interest litigation aims to bring about.
Read more,
